crosstuff.blogg.se

1. SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER UPDATE
2. SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER FULL
3. SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER SOFTWARE
4. SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER MAC

SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER UPDATE

That backup was simply so that if I did something like update the OS and find out it sucks, I could boot from the backup and recover back to that, etc.

SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER FULL

And then I also had a weekly full bootable backup I was doing with either CCC or SuperDuper.I used to flip back and forth between them because I couldn't decide which I liked better.

SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER MAC

My Mac was backedup by Time Machine, so that I could recover lost files from an exact date. If you want more info, go check out all the blogs at CCC's website.there is TONS of information there about all of this.Īs a follow up I want to add that in the past on older versions of MacOS.possibly including Mojave, but I can't remember for sure.my backup strategy was to backup twice. If you think you will not be leaving Mojave, SuperDuper would work fine too.

SSD CARBON COPY CLONER VS SUPERDUPER SOFTWARE

In short I think CCC is the way to go as it is much more modern software and has kept up at every stage with all of Apple's changes, which have all majorly affected the backup situation on MacOS. CCC has lots of white papers on this topic and are very informative. But you can't use that particular feature with the actual "bootable" backup unfortunately.

(hint hint, like an old version of LogicPro). It gets updated regularly and as I said the guy in charge at CCC writers all the white papers about the backup situation on MacOS rolling forward.Īlso the latest versions of CCC have all this stuff built in that is kind of like Time Machine based on using APFS snapshots.so if you need to recover a file from the version it was last Tuesday, you can easily do that in CCC, kind of like its own Time Machine. They are both nice pieces of software, but honestly CCC is much more active company. It might be ok on Mojave for now if you prefer that one. In my opinion he has stayed on top of the changes from Apple way way better then Super Duper and I would not even consider using SuperDuper now from where I am on Monterey. The CCC author has written a lot of white papers on various things like that which you can access from the CCC site. Eventually CCC made a way to do it, I think it probably just puts a nice GUI around that cmd line utility. There is a command line utility on MacOS you can use to do it, but its very complicated. The end result of that is that neither SuperDuper or CCC could make a truly bootable backup. However be advised that starting with Mojave, Apple introduced the APFS file system, and they also at some point in time, I can't remember when now introduced a system whereby a lot of the files they we should not mess with are stored on a hidden read only partition, etc.and some other new internal hidden partitions related to boot up and recovery, etc. I have purchased and used both pieces of software and like them both. With Mojave either one will create a bootable backup for you. They both do a lot of smart stuff about not copying over cache files, virtual memory, etc.stuff that doesn't need to be copied. With newer versions of MacOS I think you have to use some complicated command line tools to fully clone a drive, but I can't remember now.ĬCC and SuperDuper can do so called incremental updates, where it will only copy over the files that have actually changed.

Its pretty simple on Mojave, but starts to get way more complicated with newer versions of MacOS. Your boot disk has the main volume that you see and then there are hidden volumes containing other stuff.

It also does not by default automatically copy some of the hidden partitions that are needed to fully copy a boot drive. It always makes an exact clone and wipes the destination. Disk Utility can clone any volume, for free.